LAN

The Latino Action Network is a grassroots organization composed of individuals and organizations that are committed to engaging in collective action at the local, state and national levels in order to advance the equitable inclusion of the diverse Latino communities in all aspects of United States society.
Showing posts with label Governor Christie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Governor Christie. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 7, 2018

OP-ED: WHY WE NEED $15 AN HOUR MINIMUM WAGE IN NEW JERSEY NOW, NOT LATER

This op-ed by Daniel Ulloa, Vice President of Communication for LAN, originally appeared in NJ Spotlight.com.


Daniel Ulloa, writer
As living costs continue to rise in this expensive state, people are working longer hours for less money just to get by.
We need a $15 an hour minimum wage. Too many people are struggling to make ends meet in New Jersey.

Between the costs of housing, child care, transportation, and healthcare more and more people are working longer hours for less money just to get by, much less thrive. And despite the state’s low unemployment, the fact that wages have remained stagnant makes poverty a pressing issue here.

New Jersey is one of the most expensive states in the country to live in. It was recently ranked among the top 10 most unequal state in the nation. Those who are wealthy can enjoy its benefits far more than struggling workers. And while some of those who are currently struggling can go on to achieve prosperity, they unfortunately are more often the exception to the rule. There is no reason thousands should be made to toil for slave wages simply because it’s possible to find a better job.

Raising the minimum wage is always a popular action. In 2013, when Gov. Chris Christie was re-elected, a ballot measure to increase the minimum wage slightly was approved as well, thus showing such a move has bipartisan support.

Some conservatives object because they feel it would be an onerous burden on companies to pay individuals so much money. But if their customers are also making more money, they’re likely to shop more.

$15 minimum would benefit 1.2M workers in NJ

Furthermore, higher wages mean employees won’t be as likely to leave blue-collar jobs — which in turn means businesses won’t have to spend as much time training new staff. In addition, a more satisfied staff is likely to lead to an increase in productivity.
For those who feel that blue-collar workers shouldn’t make the same money as white-collar workers, remember a rising tide lifts all boats.
According to New Jersey Policy Perspective, raising the minimum wage to $15 would raise wages for 1.2 million workers in the state and inject $4.5 billion into the state’s economy.

There has been some talk of watering down the minimum-wage bill to pay youth workers less than $15 an hour. Most are seen as teenagers from middle-classes families who take the jobs merely for spending money. But youth workers need that money. Contrary to the beliefs of some, they have no desire to be a burden but rather would like to contribute and ease their family expenses. This is especially true in the homes of Hispanic families where their paychecks often go in part to sustaining the family. Youth workers must not be treated as second-class citizens.

Discrimination against older workers

Such an exemption from a $15 minimum would also likely lead to massive discrimination against older workers by employers seeking to bypass the law.

There has also been talk of excluding farmworkers. Farmworkers who perform the most arduous duties also must receive a higher wage. Why should they be left out? Many work long hours for little pay in jobs that few would willingly do. Leaving out a class of workers made up overwhelmingly by people of color is an act of blatant racism.

How are we to call ourselves the Garden State if we do not fairly compensate those who make it so?

There has been a great delay now in anticipation of the bill while living expenses continue to increase due to natural inflation. Delaying an increase for too long would erode the effect of raising the minimum wage.

In 2016, a bill to put $15 on the ballot as a referendum passed both legislative chambers easily but was vetoed by Christie and, unfortunately, the political will wasn’t there to override his veto.

Gov. Phil Murphy ran on raising the minimum wage to $15 and made it one of the central planks of his campaign. However, we have been waiting half a year for the bill to be passed. Working men and women cannot afford to wait. They have been waiting long enough while they are exploited, and deals are made to benefit those who don’t need extra protection.

The Legislature must send a bill raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour to the governor now.

Saturday, May 23, 2015

Debate on immigrant driver’s licenses simmers in N.J.









BY MONSY ALVARADO, 
Staff Writer, The Record

Governor Christie says granting driver’s licenses to immigrants in the country illegally is a homeland-security issue, so he won’t approve it.

Advocates agree on the security point. But they argue that ensuring such drivers are licensed and trained also is a matter of everyday safety to all New Jerseyans. And they are pointing to California — which has extended federally reviewed and approved driving privileges to its residents in the country without permission — as a model for New Jersey.

“This is not just an immigration issue, but a public-safety issue, and this will benefit everyone who is on the road,” said Jackie Zapata, advocacy coordinator for Wind of the Spirit, a non-profit in Morristown and part of a coalition pushing for legislation in New Jersey. “There is a huge need for this, and people are asking, ‘When?’”

A new bill to change the law in the state was introduced this month. But it already has its critics, who say any legislation that extends driving privileges to immigrants who live in the country illegally goes against federal immigration laws and that it will bring its own set of security concerns.

Advocates have been lobbying municipal officials this year. They say the legislation will not only make roads safer, but will require that newly legal drivers be insured. And because driver’s licenses cost $24, they said, the state will collect more revenue through the Motor Vehicle Commission.

The Record found immigrants in the country illegally who said they drive without licenses because they have to, for work and in raising children. But whenever they drive, some said, they fear being stopped.
“Every day, I recommend myself to God,” said Sugey Chavarria of Paterson. “It’s trauma for people to live in the shadows and to drive without a license, but it’s a necessity.”

Christie called driver’s licenses the most important form of identification and said he wouldn’t give them to people “who I cannot be sure who they are.”

“I am not doing it, and I don’t care how much income I lose. Because if I wind up compromising the homeland security of the state of New Jersey for some revenue from MVC through driver’s licenses, I would not be doing my duty,” he said last month on his monthly radio show on 101.5 FM. “As long as I’m governor, folks who are undocumented are not getting driver’s licenses, and I’ve said that from the beginning.”

But Johanna Calle, program coordinator at the New Jersey Alliance for Immigrant Justice, said that under the proposed law, the licenses would be federally approved, and pointed to California’s driver’s license for immigrants in the country illegally, a system approved by the federal Department of Homeland Security.
California licenses bear the words “FEDERAL LIMITS APPLY,” and that is the type of licensing advocates seek for New Jersey, she said.

“Homeland Security gets to vet this, and this is for the purposes to drive,” she said. “Our goal is to change the governor’s mind, absolutely, and get him to approve it. … If he sees the issue for what it is, I don’t see why he wouldn’t support it.”

Trying again

Last year, Assemblywoman Annette Quijano, D-Union, submitted a bill that would have extended driving-privilege cards to immigrants, regardless of their status. Those cards would have been used only for driving, not for purposes like identification.

This month, she filed a new bill changing the driving privilege cards to driver’s licenses. She said she did so after consulting with immigrant advocates in New Jersey and reviewing California’s system. Quijano plans to visit California soon and present findings to Christie’s office and state lawmakers.

“I know there are going to be challenges, and we will address them,” Quijano said. She stressed that the proposed law would require immigrants in the country illegally be “tested, trained, licensed, insured and accountable.”

“Getting unlicensed drivers that are untrained, untested and uninsured off the road is our goal,” she said. “The governor is welcome to his position, which is more political than it is policy-related, but it is up to us to educate the public, who can then persuade the governor to sign this legislation. Our goal is to have safe drivers on the roads of our state.”

But Ron Bass, founder of United Patriots of America in New Jersey, opposes the bill, saying it would violate federal immigration law. He also questioned how state motor vehicle offices would authenticate documents presented by foreign-born persons. People who have entered the country illegally, he said, have not been vetted by authorities.

The MVC staff “may know who you claim to be,” he said, “but your records from your country of origin are not looked into.”

There are more than 500,000 immigrants without legal permission living in New Jersey, and about 464,000 could benefit if driver’s licenses were available to them, according to a report last year by the New Jersey Policy Perspective.

Chavarria, of Paterson, is among them. More than a decade ago, she came from Costa Rica on a tourist visa, which has since expired. For years, she said, she drove with a Texas license but, when it expired a few years ago, she could not renew it. She drives only locally for the most part, she said, tending to her family and sometimes going to Bergen County to clean houses.

The mother of two said having a driver’s license also would provide valid identification. “By not having documents here,” she said, “you get discriminated against.”

Carlos Guaran of North Bergen bicycles each week to Palisades Park, seeking day work in landscaping and construction. Not being able to drive, he said, has limited his prospects, but he fears being stopped on the road by police.

Tomas Sipak, another day laborer seeking work in Palisades Park, said he’s lost opportunities when he’s had to reveal he doesn’t have a license. “A few people said that if I had a license they would get me a permanent job,’’ he said.

Newark OKs ID cards

This year, the New Jersey Alliance for Immigrant Justice, a statewide coalition, is educating the public about the driver’s license bill. So far, it has gotten six municipalities to pass resolutions supporting the legislation. On Thursday, Newark became the first city in the state to approve giving city-issued identification cards to immigrants in the country illegally, another cause the coalition has advocated.

Those cards can be shown to police in Newark and used to open bank accounts, advocates said. New York City launched its immigrant identification card this year.

“We have been pushing for the identification cards because we need some sort of identification if the licenses are not moving right away, so we are doing both,” said Calle.

A community forum on the licensing issue is set for July 18 at the Cathedral of St. John the Baptist in Paterson.

Ten states and Washington, D.C., allow immigrants who are in the country illegally to drive, with most passing laws in recent years. California and Connecticut began issuing licenses in January, and Maryland, Nevada, Vermont and Colorado implemented programs last year. Alaska, Georgia and Maine allow limited driving privileges to certain immigrants. State lawmakers in Florida, North Carolina, Rhode Island and
Minnesota also have introduced bills.

In November, an Oregon referendum rejected allowing licenses for immigrants in the country illegally.

‘Bring people hope’

President Obama’s executive action aimed at giving temporary protection from deportation to millions of immigrants in the country illegally has stalled in the federal courts. And Zapata, the Wind of the Spirit official, said “something like this, that will involve more people, will bring people hope,” as immigrants await those court decisions.

Obama’s 2012 executive action shielded unauthorized youth and young adults from deportation if they had been brought into the country as children. Ann Morse, program director of the Immigration Policy Project at the National Conference of State Legislatures, said that besides the concern for safety and to get unauthorized immigrant drivers insured, the executive action has spurred a growing number of lawmakers who want to extend driving privileges. The young adults who qualified for the deportation waivers received work permits and Social Security cards, and in many states, including New Jersey, are able to get driver’s licenses.

“That,” Morse said, “gave people a new frame to look at the issue and say, ‘Perhaps we need to see what our legislation, our regulations say and should we be considering the public safety aspects of this as well as the national security aspect of this?’”

State House Correspondent Melissa Hayes contributed to this article. Email: alvarado@northjersey.com

Friday, April 10, 2015

In opposing Obama action on immigration, Christie is abandoning Latinocommunity | Opinion


In opposing Obama action on immigration, Christie is abandoning Latino community | Opinion

By Rudy A. Rodas, Esq.

Gov. Chris Christie's sinking presidential aspirations have led him to join a federal lawsuit seeking to block the temporary relief from deportation for millions of undocumented immigrants working hard to build a new life in the United States. It is another desperate ploy along the campaign trail for a governor that in recent weeks has settled an environmental lawsuit with a potential donor for billions less than anticipated and has had the New Jersey Supreme Court strip his administration of its ability to enforce fair affordable housing standards.

Immigrants are just another stepping stone for the governor.


This latest politically motivated action counters the impact of the In-State Tuition Equality Law he signed in December 2013 which allows undocumented students educated in New Jersey schools to pay in-state tuition rates. By entering the lawsuit against President Obama's executive action, Gov. Christie puts our state on the side of those fighting against regulations that would give undocumented students permission to work legally in the United States, thus hindering their ability to pay for their college education.

The Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) and the expansion of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) are the two major programs arising from the president's executive actions. They grant deportation relief and work authorization to the parents of U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents and to undocumented students who arrived in our country as children. These programs were created by President Obama in response to Congress's failure to pass comprehensive immigration reform. 

While the president cannot make laws, as part of his executive powers he has the discretion to determine immigration enforcement priorities. This executive power has been used in the past by both Republican and Democratic presidents to create temporary immigration relief programs. DAPA and DACA were created as temporary means to stop the separation of families and maximize the economic potential of undocumented immigrants contributing to our society.

When Gov. Christie signed the In-State Tuition bill, he articulated these same goals as the basis of his support of undocumented students: "Even if you're cold-hearted about this, you can agree with the common sense of the economics" he said. "Our job, I believe, as a government, is to give every one of these children, who we have already invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in, an opportunity to maximize that investment." DACA and DAPA further accomplish these economic goals on a national and state level by increasing the Gross Domestic Product, reducing the deficit, raising tax revenue and raising average wages.

It’s illogical for Gov. Christie to fight against these economic benefits at a time when the state suffers.

Nationally, the White House Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) estimates that over the next 10 years, these programs will increase gross domestic product by between $90 and $210 billion. The Center for American Progress estimates that DAPA could increase payroll tax revenues by to $21.2 billion over five years. In New Jersey that translates into $136 million in tax revenues over five years and the state's gross domestic product would increase by between $2.9 billion to $6.8 billion over the next ten years.

It's illogical and irresponsible for Gov. Christie to fight against these economic benefits at a time when the state suffers from sluggish state job recovery, successive downgrades of New Jersey's credit ratings, Atlantic City casino closures and an inability to pay into the pension fund. More importantly, the executive action programs provide an alternative revenue raising measure that does not involve raising taxes or slashing spending. Instead of developing economic policies that are beneficial for all New Jersey residents, Gov. Christie has wasted political capital by taking a stance that is tantamount to the endorsement of passive deportation that targets vulnerable, undocumented immigrants once advocated by failed presidential candidate Mitt Romney.

With an eye on the upcoming presidential elections, Gov. Christie actively courted the state Latino vote. Since he was re-elected handily by winning a majority of the statewide Latino vote, the Latino community and immigration advocates made it clear that in-state tuition equality was a policy priority. They compromised with Gov. Christie by reluctantly agreeing to a bill that did not include state financial aid for undocumented students. Similar to his failure to make pension payments and abandonment of his own Pension Reform Law, Gov. Christie has demonstrated a failure of leadership by abandoning both his own immigration policy and the community that made his presidential prospects viable.

Rudy A. Rodas, Esq., is the co-chair of the Latino Action Network's Immigration Committee.

Follow The Star-Ledger on Twitter @starledger. Find The Star-Ledger on Facebook.

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Sign the Petition Urging Governor Chris Christie to Withdraw HisSupport from the Lawsuit Opposing President Obama's Executive Actionfor Immigrants


The Latino Action Network (LAN) has sent a letter to New Jersey Governor Chris Christie urging him to withdraw his support for a lawsuit challenging President Obama's Executive Action for immigrants.  The lawsuit, filed by 26 states, has led to an injunction of the Executive Action on DACA and DAPA, delaying relief for immigrant families in New Jersey. 

Please join us in calling on Governor Christie to withdraw his support for the lawsuit against Executive Action for Immigrants by signing the petition below:


Wednesday, March 20, 2013

DANIEL SANTO PIETRO REFERS TO THE "DESTRUCTIVE DOZEN" IN HIS TESTIMONY ON BEHALF OF LAN TO THE NEW JERSEY SENATE BUDGET AND APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE


Daniel Santo-Pietro, LAN Public Policy Chair, delivered testimony on behalf of the Latino Action Network to the New Jersey Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee.   He focused his comments on the 12 items that have done the most harm to working families during the last three budget cycles.  The "Destructive Dozen", as Daniel called them, remain in the Governor’s FY2014 Budget. Daniel ended his testimony by calling for the passage of the In-State Tuition bill that would help immigrant students get a college education and urging the legislature to negotiate with the Governor to resolve the "Destructive Dozen" budget items and move our State forward.  Please read Daniel's testimony below:



TESTIMONY TO SENATE BUDGET AND APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE
MARCH 20, 2013


The Latino Action Network is a 501c4 organization with a Steering Committee comprised of Latino leaders from across the State from unions, community organizations, academia and professional backgrounds.  Our President is Frank Argote-Freyre, a well known historian and activist.  We are a membership organization with students and many other Latinos counted among our ranks.  We maintain a separate PAC and Foundation using social networking tools to involve a broad cross-section of people.  Our testimony and other documents can be accessed at our website and on our Facebook page.

Our testimony comes from the perspective of low to moderate income working families and owners of very small businesses who constitute the majority of Hispanics, a community that is often voiceless in Trenton .  Hispanics are approaching 25% of the population of New Jersey and increasingly they are actively pursuing their interests both nationally and locally. 

The Latino Action Network wants to draw your attention to the Destructive Dozen. We want to focus on the 12 items that have done the most harm to working families during the last three budget cycles.  The Destructive Dozen remain in the Governor’s FY2014 Budget.  We hope the Governor will reconsider his strategy of hurting the poor and helping the rich and we urge legislators to use their considerable power to probe the relevant departments during hearings and make changes in the budget where possible. The Governor never met a rich man he did not want to shower with tax breaks. His compassion for the wealthy knows no limit. The time has come to create a Commission that would investigate these trends and determine how a rich state like New Jersey can reverse them.

THE DESTRUCTIVE DOZEN

  1. New Jersey has the fourth highest unemployment rate in the country.  Yet budget proposals for training and other employment initiatives are too few and far too little in dollars.  One such initiative led by the Hispanic community, Hispanic Women’s Resource Centers, saw their modest $500 thousand eliminated from the budget.  The Governor still seems to depend on grants to corporations to generate more jobs, but there is no convincing evidence it has worked in the past.
  
  1. The Governor’s veto of the minimum wage increase weighs most heavily on working families. LAN is in favor of the minimum wage increase to $8.25/ hr and will support it if it is on the ballot in November.  Combined with the Governor’s failure to move ahead on the increase of the State EITC, these two steps are a painful one-two punch to working families.

  1. Governor Christie in his first budget underfunded the School Funding Reform Act (SFRA) by $1.6 Billion. This year Governor Christie’s proposed budget provides flat funding for 200 districts, mostly those that are economically disadvantaged.  The SFRA was a bi-partisan compromise that created a funding formula that allowed funds to follow the child no matter which district where they were enrolled.  The Governor’s arbitrary changes to the Formula reduce the weight given in the SFRA to at-risk children and English learners.  These changes mean that schools with large numbers of Hispanic children, mostly urban schools where working families have their children enrolled, will have to meet their formidable challenges with less resources.  Last year the legislature took out language in the Budget that would have permanently changed the formula, but left the revised funding formula intact.  This year you must correct the problem of appropriating less and less money to the children who need it most.  This is the type of basic mathematics that anyone can understand.

  1. In the context described above the proposed $2 Million for Opportunity Scholarships is a cruel joke.  It will help a few private schools with their enrollment but take away resources from the schools that must educate the overwhelming number of children of working families.  The voucher approach is not what New Jersey schools need to improve.

  1. Preschool funding in the Budget does nothing to expand preschool to districts that have sizeable number of children from working families.   The preponderance of evidence shows that the preschools opened in the 31 previous Abbott districts under court order have been a resounding success.  Hispanic children from lower income families, some with limited English, have caught up with other children in reading skills, vocabulary, even exposure to science and math.  This allows them to begin K-12 with a much greater chance to succeed.  The evidence is so great that President Obama has called for a national effort to provide preschool to all children.  We expected this budget at least to propose funding for more districts who want to expand preschools for at-risk children as a part of the public school program.
  
  1. Last year the Department of Human Services made eligibility for wrap-around child care so strict as to eliminate many families.  This service allowed working families to bring their children to preschool early and pick them up after three as needed to accommodate their working hours.  The new requirements caused many low income families to drop this service and in some cases to take their child out of preschool altogether. The most onerous is demanding verification of income with paystubs or W-2s that many Hispanics who work in micro businesses and part-time employment cannot satisfy.  The logic of preventing a few people from getting undeserved benefits by cutting off thousands from needed child care eludes me.  This is yet another blow to working families struggling to educate their child.

  1. The scarcity of funding for community after-school programs has left a void for many working families.  The addition of $1 million in the DOE budget for these programs will hardly replace programs previously cut from the budget or put in operation the needed programs to protect and nurture children who live in dangerous neighborhoods.  Please demand the details of this program and determine whether it will meet the demand for this service.

  1. The Governor’s decision to carry out the expansion of Medicaid which is a key element in ObamaCare was the right one.  Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) the federal government will pay 100% of the cost to insure over 300,000 low income parents and childless adults.  On the other hand the Governor’s disparaging remarks in his Budget speech about the Affordable Care Act was misguided.  If fully implemented, the ACA has a goal of reaching near universal coverage and could cover about 800,000 low and moderate income New Jerseyans bringing the percentage of uninsured down from almost 20% to 8.8%, according to the State Center for Health Policy.  This is a goal worth achieving.

  1. The Center for State Health Policy identified Hispanics as the most significant segment of the “Changing Insurance Buying Public”, and among the most challenging to communicate with effectively.  The Governor vetoed the creation of a state-run marketplace for health coverage, but the State still has to cooperate fully with the federally run marketplace and support starting in October 2013 an enrollment process simple and accessible to working families who need it most.  The failure to include any funds in the State Budget for public education outreach aimed at working families who need assistance to understand what they have to do to gain coverage is a major missing piece.  Federal funding will pay for phone and on-line customer service, media announcements and a limited number of “Navigators” who will help people fill out forms, but community education and even door to door outreach is the key to getting eligible people subsidies to buy the health insurance available through the Marketplace starting January 2014.
  
  1. In the past three budgets, there have been deep cuts in community based programs aimed at low income Hispanics.  Cuts to the Division of Youth and Family Services partnerships with Hispanic community organizations, and elimination of Hispanic Women’s Resource Centers that taught English and computer skills tso that women, many immigrants, could secure employment, are among the more egregious examples.  The governor’s budget offers no hope of increases that will correct this unfortunate mistake of the last three years.  Now when Jose is having a problem with unscrupulous landlords, his limited English means he no longer has a place in his community to turn to for counseling about his rights.  Maria an 80 year old living alone no longer can get help with doing chores or some one to check on her well being.  Jaime has no after school program that his local community agency used to offer and has become a latch-key child because his parents have to work.  These are all examples of real damage to families caused by the Christie campaign against working families.

  1. Most regretful, the Governor dismantled the one agency in State Government aimed at giving Hispanics a voice in the State bureaucracy, the Center for Hispanic Policy (CHPRD).  He reduced its funding by 75% to $1 million and moved it to the Secretary of State where its mission was changed from supporting Hispanic initiated community programs to a vague small grant organization with virtually no interest in supporting Hispanic community initiatives.  LAN urges legislators to recommend changes to the performance of CHPRD.

  1. Finally, we end with the issue of taxes.  Last year the Governor proposed an across the board income tax cut, which would have given working families peanuts while offering the wealthy a bonanza.  Fortunately, it was not implemented.  The Governor speaks often of his effort to control increases on property taxes, a tax that weighs heavily on working families whether they own or rent a home.  We strongly urge him to abandon income tax cuts and concentrate on bringing property taxes down significantly.  Otherwise, working families will always be at a huge disadvantage. 

Some people call 2013 the Year of the Hispanic.  A Latin American Pope who has a love for the poor and a major drive for Comprehensive Immigration Reform in Washington to relieve all Americans from the broken and unjust immigration laws are two good signs. We even expect New Jersey to join Texas and California in granting all our immigrant children In-State Tuition.  We urge the legislature to negotiate with the Governor to resolve the Destructive Dozen budget items and move our State forward.

Presented by Daniel Santo Pietro, Chair Public Policy
Latino Action Network, PO Box 943, Freehold, NJ 07728

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Hispanic Bar of New Jersey Disappointed with Governor Christie's Lack of Latino Nominations to Supreme Court



By Politicker Staff | December 19th, 2012 - 4:44pm

A nonprofit representing the state’s Hispanic legal community expressed disappointment earlier this week over Gov. Chris Christie’s decision not to nominate a Latino to the state Supreme Court.

The Hispanic Bar Association of New Jersey issued a statement earlier this week criticizing the governor for failing to nominate a person for the high court who would better reflect the state’s diversity.

“The HBA-NJ considers it imperative that the leaders of our state appoint individuals that proportionately reflect the residents of New Jersey in order to instill public trust in our government and the justice system,” the association said in a statement.

“As the largest minority population in the state of New Jersey, and the largest growing minority population throughout the United States, Latinos have undeniably made significant contributions to the state,” reads the statement.

The association, which declared it is not currently taking a position on Christie’s two nominees, said the governor’s failure to nominate a Latino candidate has “been perceived by many as dismissive of the Latino community’s growth.”

Christie nominated Board of Public Utilities President Robert Hanna and Judge David Bauman to the state Supreme Court earlier this month.

The Latino Action Network announced shortly after the governor’s nominations that it opposes the governor’s plan to leave the Supreme Court without either an African-American or Latino member.